14. How many gas chambers to kill people were there at Auschwitz?

---

Ernst Zündel

Nizkor begins by standing the argument on its head. Nizkor writes: "Wrong, as usual; no evidence, as usual. . ."

Let's call a pause here and focus in on this matter of evidence. Revisionists are UNDER NO OBLIGATION to produce any evidence whatsoever. If you call somebody a thief, or a drug pusher, or a murderer, it is YOU who must bring proof. Anybody can make accusations. Accusations must be backed by facts that can be verified.

It is the Holocaust Hucksters, with their obstinate promotion of this outlandish propaganda claim that there were homicidal gassings in places like Auschwitz who are under strict obligation to produce the evidence in support of their fantastic yarns.

Höss utterly terrified of British interrigators

who obtained a "confession" out of him

Click here for full story of this picture

The fact is that, even 50 years after the alleged events, the Holocaust Hucksters have consistently and miserably failed to provide even minimal evidence in support of what they are claiming. This, despite the virtually limitless resources at their disposal. All they have is so-called "victim testimonials" and the "Hoess Confession" tortured out of a defenseless man.

And now, as the structure of lies and deceit is crumbling right around their ankles, instead of truth and logic, they fall back on brutally punitive, coercive laws to sustain their discredited and unsupported atrocity propaganda (e.g., I have in mind the recent disgraceful event in Germany, mentioned below, where a scientist gets sentenced to prison for writing an impeccable forensic report refuting the Holocaust Hoax, or the sleazy recent tactic of knocking out CODOH - the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust - from the Internet, without rhyme, reason, or warning).

The challenges and questions, put to the Holocaust Hucksters by Revisionists and others, stand unaddressed. Their latest "star" performer, Pressac, financed by the aggressively hucksterish Klarsfeld Foundation, fell flat on his face in providing answers and is now being quietly sidelined, as one can observe from Nizkor's text: they prefer to recommend as reference for their pretensions a source more aligned to the Politburo Party Line.

This is really getting tiresome.

Since the Zündel Trial in 1988 the world has been informed - and, by this time, many millions already know! - that there exists not one small shred of forensic evidence that there were ever any homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz - except disinfestation chambers to exterminate vermin.

The plain truth is that the Allies manufactured the "gas chamber" story as atrocity propaganda to "stoke up" their own people against the "Nazis" and to distract their people from their own war crimes - such as the terror bombing of civilians and the mass rapes, robberies and brutalities of the Red Army.

There have now been four independent forensic and scientific investigations of Auschwitz's so-called "gas chambers" since 1988. Here is what needs to sink into the hardest skull of the most obsessive Holocaust Huckster: There were no "gas chambers" for killing people at Auschwitz or anywhere else in Germany! The Holocaust Promotion Lobby has no scientific evidence whatsoever for the existence of such homicidal "gas chambers" - only "witness testimony" and propaganda claims!

Four experts have now looked into this thoroughly and left us their reports:

• The Leuchter Report - Fred A. Leuchter, Jr. was, and is, an expert specializing in gas chambers and executions and was so certified by a Toronto Court during the Second Zündel Trial. He was described by Missouri State Penitentiary Warden Bill M. Armontrout as "well versed in all areas and. . . the only consultant in the United States [in gas chambers] that I know of."
  
• Leuchter examined the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in 1988 and of Dachau, Hartheim and Mauthausen in 1989, and took samples from the walls and floors for forensic testing for cyanide residue to be done in the United States. He concluded that the rooms were not and could not have been used as homicidal gas chambers based on their construction and the fact that either no or only extremely small traces of cyanide residue were found in the brick and mortar samples of these alleged "killing sites".
  
• In contrast, a room where Zyklon B - the alleged killing gas - was used for disinfection purposes by the Germans, the brick and mortar had 1000 times more (!) cyanide residue in the samples than the alleged "gas chambers" which supposedly were used to kill millions around the clock. [Click here to see chart]
  
• Leuchter did not conduct these laboratory tests. Professor Dr. James Roth, a ten-year veteran of Princeton and a court-approved expert, analyzed and tested the rock soil and wall scrapings from the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz at the prestigious Alpha Labs in the USA and testified to the negative results in 1988 under oath in Toronto. The entire record can be found in the chapter titled "James Roth" in "Did Six Million Really Die", by attorney Barbara Kulaszka - court records cited many times before. His testimony, and that of Fred Leuchter in a chapter by that name, is well worth re-reading. "Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Zündel - 1988."
  
• The Krakow Institute Report - Alarmed by the Leuchter Report, the Auschwitz State Museum itself commissioned in 1990 the Krakow Forensic Institute to carry out an investigation of the alleged gassing sites. The Krakow Report fully corroborated the cyanide readings found by Leuchter, although it interpreting the results differently.
  
• The Auschwitz Museum maintains, not too surprisingly, that Poland's acid rain had eliminated the cyanide. This flies in the face of the scientific fact that the "Prussian blue", the compound formed by cyanide and iron in the bricks and mortar, is one of the most stable and enduring compounds (discoloratation is perhaps a better word) known to man. The late Dr. William Lindsey, Chief Research Chemist for Dupont of America stated that this combination of Zyklon B with iron could last thousands of years in rain, sleet and open air. This telling blue stain is clearly seen today in disinfection chambers, but not in the so-called "gas chambers" at Auschwitz.
  
• We are now asked by the Holocaust Hucksters to believe that the rain selectively washed out the evidence of the so-called "gas chambers" but left the evidence where vermin had been killed. Believable? So is the Easter Bunny.
  
• The Lüftl Report - Walter Lüftl is a professional engineer with a large engineering firm in Vienna. He is a former president of the Austrian Association of Engineers.
  
• Over a period of 25 years, Lüftl was regularly called in court cases as an expert witness involving engineering and construction matters. In 1992 Lüftl wrote a report calling the alleged extermination of millions of Jews in gas chambers during WWII "technically impossible."
  
• Lüftl also pointed out that the design and numbers of the crematories showed that they were incapable of handling the number of "gassed" victims routinely alleged by the Holocaust Lobby. "Corpses are not flammable material," wrote Lüftl. "to cremate them requires much time and energy. . . " none of which the Germans had in limitless abundance.
  
• Lüftl was criminally charged in Austria - where "Holocaut Denial" is a criminal offense - for writing this report "denying the Holocaust." but all charges against him were quietly dropped.
  
• The Rudolf Report - Germar Rudolf, a diplom chemist in Germany trained at the Max Planck Institute, a famous German facility, investigated the sites of the alleged homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz and took samples for the purpose of determining cyanide levels. Rudolf's report concluded, like Leuchter's, that the alleged gas chambers could never have been used for the claimed mass gassings on an industrial scale. Tests on samples showed no or minimal traces of cyanide.
  
• Germar Rudolf is a special case and illustrates that when it comes to the so-called "gas chambers" of places such as Auschwitz, society no longer deals in rationality and reason. Here is a young, profoundly apolitical young man with a new family and no links whatsoever to any political, much less "extremist" group - like "Holocaust Deniers." He wrote a treatise on his findings that is impeccable. He submitted his report to more than 300 experts for their critique before he published it.
  
• Not one of them found even the smallest error!
  
• Germar Rudolf was criminally charged under Germany's repressive "Holocaust-is-a-dogma" law. Just a few weeks ago, Germar Rudolf has been sentenced to a prison term of 18 months for his scientific finding. The book he wrote has been banned in Germany, and many people connected to its publication have been punished with jail terms and/or fines. The report has been ordered to be destroyed.
  
• This brilliant scientist, with a young, pregnant wife and a baby already born, has been evicted twice from his apartment for his "sin." He is now in political exile - his career ruined and his life in shreds.
  
• It is a monumental sham! It's Shoah business at its sleaziest. The so-called "Holocaust" has now degenerated into a voodoo-like Holocaust Promotion Cult with its operators doing their desperate best, by hook or by crook, to avoid being exposed to the light of day. (Lesser, but none-theless perfect examples are the recent website cancellations such as CODOH International, based in the United States, The Adelaide Institute in Australia, and The Freedom-Site in Canada.)
  
• Cannot intelligent people settle this matter once and for all? Why doesn't the scientific community - world-wide! - get together and appoint a Grand Jury type investigation? We are not living in the Middle Ages any more where Galileo Galilei must recant his "heresies" - or else!
  
• In March of 1993, I wrote:
  
• "We have to start a letter writing campaign to . . . international bodies to put pressure on the German government to stop persecuting and harassing people just because they have a different viewpoint on history when it concerns the Holocaust.
  
• We also have to ask that the UN Human Rights Organizations force Germany to allow civilized trials, where experts can be heard - experts like Leuchter, Faurisson, and Irving - and not just some Kangaroo Court proceedings in which the accused basically gets called to the bar to be convicted, and has no chance to present his viewpoints buttressed by expert witnesses and documents.
  
• In my own case in Munich, Fred Leuchter, the gas chamber expert, was not allowed to testify because he was considered "not qualified" . . . Dr. Faurisson was not allowed to testify - "not qualified". I had asked Germar Rudolf, a qualified, university trained Diplom Chemist to testify - he too was disqualified.
  
• Not a single witness was allowed to testify in my defense, to make clear my reasons for saying that no six million people were gassed in places like Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek.
  
• This situation must be changed. I believe that if all of us work together, we can make the necessary changes inside the courts and in the media in Germany.
  
• We are the new 'Freedom Fighters'! Our weapons are our pens, typewriters, computers, or just our telephones, fax machines and telegrams. Thousands of letters should flood their offices. We must act, not just talk."
  
• Will Nizkor act - not just talk? Will Nizkor stop confabulating by simply relabeling morgues into "gas chambers" and crematories into killing centers and get to the crux of the matter?

I challenge the world to appoint a Blue Ribbon Commission to investigate this hoax once and for all. Revisionists have nothing to fear.