ZGram - 4/20/2003 - " Ernst Zundel, Pontius Pilate, Jesus
Christ: an Analogy for Good Friday Meditation"
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org
Sun Apr 20 08:02:49 EDT 2003
ZGram
- Where Truth is Destiny: Now more than ever!
April 20, 2003
Good Morning from the Zundelsite:
Again there is something wrong with my ZGrams getting out on time.
Additionally, there is interference with my letters to Ernst, and his
letters to me. Even Global Priority, which should take no longer
than 3 days, arrives belatedly two weeks or more after it has been
mailed - or disappears entirely. And just a few days ago I had a
horrendous telephone problem - while I could receive regular calls, I
could not receive collect calls from Ernst, and I could not call out
at all, not even 411 for phone number information. When I finally
managed to get the word out to Bell South, the repairman who came to
my aid said that in 31 years of working for the telephone company, he
had never once encountered a problem like that.
Just what that "problem" consisted of, I have not been able to ferret
out. The lame excuse given by the central business office was that a
block had been put on my lines because I received too many calls, but
it should not have mattered because my account was paid up, and the
next billing cycle was not yet due. So something fishy is again
going on! It seems that interference never ends!
The ZGram below was meant for Good Friday - however, since I only
received it on Saturday and had already planned my ZGram for the day,
I am running it today. Let me just preface it by saying that when
Ernst carried a cross during one of his innumerable Holocaust Trials
to demonstrate that Freedom of Speech had died in Canada, many people
objected and thought he was presumptuous to liken himself to Christ's
walk to Golgatha. Of course the idea was to make a harmful issue
visible by parable.
Here Dr. Robert Countess, a former Army Chaplain and a stout
Revisionist who is publicizing Ernst's latest persecution to a more
general readership, wrote this:
[START]
Ernst
Zundel, Pontius Pilate, Jesus Christ: an Analogy for Good Friday
Meditation
By Robert H. Countess, Ph.D.
According to the New Testament documents, Passover Week Friday
was the day Jesus was crucified as 1) a simple Roman execution; 2) a
hate crime and show trial by evil Jewish leaders - but not the
masses; and 3) a theological event of universal soteriological
significance in the plan of God for redemption.
However, the events of the night prior must be considered in
order to gain valuable perspective.
After Jesus celebrated the Passover meal in the Upper Room and
Judas the Treasurer had departed for his opportunistic Thirty Pieces
of Silver [a large sum then], the group walked to the Garden of
Gethsemane [perhaps as beautiful as Hatcher Mountain] where Jesus
prayed and the disciples all fell asleep. Then Judas came leading a
group of armed soldiery and policemen large enough perhaps to
frighten a Saddam Hussein. [One might recall the five officers who
came to arrest the pacifist Ernst Zundel on February 5th, 2003 armed
and one even with a flak vest.] Judas came forward and placed his
evil kiss on Jesus' cheek and the personal betrayal for Geld was
done.
We read that the red-haired [Catholic "first Pope"] fisherman
Peter pulled a sword and attacked the High Priest's bond slave
Malchus [John 18:10] but was so poorly trained in violent combat
that he only cut off the right ear - which Jesus healed on the spot
[Luke 22:51]. At this point, the Disciples fled for their lives. The
High Priest's vigilantes then bound Jesus [leg irons?] and led him to
the rich Palace of Annas, father-in-law to High Priest Caiaphas.
Annas had been High Priest but he had still the enormous influence of
the office without now occupying it; plus he "contributed", shall we
say, large sums of money to "friends" in the Roman government of
Jerusalem. Power, money, influence, and family members in high
government circles? What a more proper first stop for this threat to
national security, Jesus, than Annas' place of residence and business?
Immense capital flowed from the Temple precincts into Annas'
coffers. Little wonder that Jesus was so hated for His onslaught [see
John 2:13f] into these for-profit chambers, upturning tables and
scattering the Jewish filthy lucre and rope whipping the money
changers who, Jesus was convinced, had turned Jehovah's house into "a
den of thieves"!
The Roman soldiers had their orders to take Jesus to Annas'
place, no doubt having gotten some shekels to grease the path. The
often whispered "Jewish Power" by timid Gentiles of our own day is
nothing new, it seems, since the hated and pagan Romans themselves
yielded to Jewish Power and, of course, as always, money in
sufficient quantities to make it all seem appropriate.
High Priest Caiaphas was already His implacable enemy but now
became His accuser and judge. Around Caiaphas were--like those
around Saddam--large numbers in his service, fearful to cross him
lest they experience some "difficulty" in life and employment.
There's nothing like the corrupt use of power by corrupt religious
leaders!
A hastily gathered ad hoc meeting of Priests and Elders,
Sanhedrinists, Lawyers, and Scribes appeared that pre-Passover
evening. A regular meeting of this "Supreme Court" would never have
been held on Passover or Passover Eve itself, but so great a threat
to the vested interests of Jewry did Jesus appear to be that they
came and stayed to effect their "Privat-mord" as one scholar put it
in his Geschichte des Judenthums [19th century]. This "private
murder" was not the routine result of a normally held Great Sanhedrin
and its full 71 members for whom the hated Romans allowed full
authority over religious matters except capital punishment itself -
left only to the Roman Governor Pontius Pilate. And since Jesus
basically refused to offer a defense for Himself - since He came to
die as Messiah - the gathered authorities resorted to distortion of
His message and then, in the end, to lying and bribed [oh the power
of money over conscience to many people!] false witnesses who gave
their "eyewitness" testimonies which largely contradicted each other.
Jews are not alone among two-legged sentient air-suckers [my term for
homo sapiens] in giving false, alleged "eyewitness" testimony, but
they may well be unique in being the most successful as an
identifiable group in employing it in the past and--since World War
Two - now in the present in so-called "testi-lying" on behalf of the
Holocaust Industry.
Perhaps the Great Sanhedrin chief prosecutor even insisted upon
"judicial notice" that Jesus had committed all sorts of felonies that
made him a threat to national security? Why not? May be that
Nuremberg jurisprudence had ample precedent for its own nefarious
methods to convict and condemn in 1945-6.
The final "evidence" to support judicial condemnation came,
however, when Jesus finally spoke to High Priest Caiaphas and
admitted to being "the Christ, the Son of God" [Matthew 26:63-4]. We
read that Caiaphas tore his outer robe as a display of hearing
blasphemy [vs. 65], announcing with a loud voice that the trouble
maker was obviously worthy of death. At this, the standers-by began
to spit in Jesus' face and to beat Him and taunt Him with commands to
engage in fortune telling such as "Who hit you?"
Of major interest for this present essay is Matthew 27:15f. The
text states that there was a tradition associated with the Passover
wherein Governor Pontius Pilate would allow the crowd to select the
release of a prisoner scheduled for execution. Now, if the
Sanhedrinist authorities could redirect the crowd's general empathy
for Jesus away from Jesus and toward the felon and real national
security threat, Bar-Abbas [Hebrew & Aramaic "son of the father"],
then they could succeed in having the hated Roman Governor himself
execute Jesus and they could blame - that is, relieve themselves of
personal and legal responsibility - Pilate for the execution.
To this end, the priestly agitators shouted out to Pilate,
"Release Bar-Abbas!" Perhaps some "walking around" money flowed to
certain loud-voiced men in the crowd to shout louder and incessantly,
"Release to us Bar-Abbas!" In due time - how long, the text does not
say - Pilate gave in to the masses' clamor for the release of a real
felon and in his place the crucifixion of the preacher of love and
peace, Jesus the Messiah. How pleased the Sanhedrinists must have
felt if, as they might have thought: "We finally are about to be rid
of this pest, this bacillus, and we can thank the crowd and Governor
Pilate for doing the dirty work." [I have found in Talmud study that
Talmudic Jews routinely seek not to obey the law of God in the Torah,
but rather to circumnavigate around the law after the experts have
diluted it or complicated it or nullified it with countless
inferential and/or implied details so burdensome that a sane person
would conclude: Who cares? What is the purpose after all? God is
not the goal, but human striving for self-recognition. Can anyone
actually obey what the Talmudists have created and now call Halachoth?
Finally, we come to the analogy of Ernst Zundel in his solitary
confinement in the Niagara Falls, Ontario detention center.
If the evil movers and shakers and string pullers behind Ernst's
continued imprisonment with no granting of bail in sight - the
Canadian Jewish Congress and its brother organizations there and the
Anti-Defamation League in the USA - had been given Pilate's choice
on Good Friday 2003, I believe they would have behaved with the same
insane reasoning and emotion of the rabble in Pilate's presence.
Let us say that "Pilate" in 2003 would have offered the felon Irv
Rubin [former Jewish Defense League Director] to the crowd, a
notorious criminal and street bully and firebomber extraordinaire, I
believe the CJC would bribe the masses to shout for the release of
Irv and to "crucify" Ernst Zundel.
If our contemporary "Pilate" were to offer one of several Jewish
hatemongers such as Elie Wiesel or Abe Foxman or Edgar Bronfman to
the babbling, gaggling, cackling crowd of circumcised and
uncircumcised riffraff, the flotsam and jetsam of big city Toronto in
place of Ernst Zundel, I believe the CJC and its supporters would
immediately raise shouts of "Release to us Elie or Abe or Edgar and
Crucify Ernst!"
I have met Elie Wiesel. I have met Irv Rubin. Believe me, Ernst
Zundel is no Elie Wiesel. Ernst Zundel is no Irv Rubin. Ernst holds
strong opinions about history and society and life and Zionism and
Freemasonry, but he promotes no hatred for those who disagree with
him.
The CJC is unified in its hatred of Ernst Zundel. The CJC is
unified in its hatred of Jesus Christ. The CJC is unified in its
irrational support for Jewish Supremacy and the State of Israel and
the ethnic-cleansing of the Semito-Palestinians [my term]. The CJC is
unified in opposing bail for Ernst Zundel at any price and at any
time. The CJC fears Ernst Zundel, but not because he has a gun in his
hand, but rather a pencil stub and continues to write and promote
the open discussion of the Holocaust Industry's Holo-hoax upon
Germans and all Gentiles and upon ignorant Jews themselves.
The CJC is right to fear Ernst Zundel's stubby pencil and is
right to fear his wife's Zundelsite and is right to fear the Internet
in general, since - as Germar Rudolf put it - "Internet macht frei!"
Robert H. Countess, Ph.D.
boblbpinc at earthlink.net
Huntsville, Alabama
[END]
More information about the Zgrams
mailing list