ZGram - 4/23/2004 - *** Revisionism Redux ***

[zgrams at zgrams.zundelsite.org]

ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny:  Now more than ever!

April 23, 2004

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

When I read the Faurisson piece below to Ernst Zundel, he said after 
a brief silence:  "He dances like a butterfly - and stings like a 
bee."  I believe this is the best summary yet that has the potential 
of moving Holocaust Revisionism into mainstream awareness in the 
Western world. 

Please memorize it.  Copy and disperse it.  Post it wherever you can. 
Spread it to the snoozing masses.  It all but shouts at you:  "Think!"


[START]

"Hitler's and Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction"

Is it not simply wondrous to be told the same lie twice by the same 
people and for the same purpose at nearly sixty years' distance?

In January 1944, US President Franklin D. Roosevelt decided to 
create, on the advice of the Jew Henry Morgenthau and his cohorts, 
the so-called War Refugee Board (WRB). In November 1944, that 
official body published, under the heading "Executive Office of the 
President / War Refugee Board / Washington, DC" a report entitled 
"German Extermination Camps Auschwitz and Birkenau", falsely accusing 
Adolf Hitler of possessing weapons of mass destruction or WMD's 
(called execution gas chambers).

In 2002, President George W. Bush decided to create, on the advice of 
the Jew Paul Wolfowitz and his cohorts, the so-called Office of 
Special Plans (OSP). Headed by Abram Shulsky, that official body 
promoted reports falsely accusing Saddam Hussein of having WMD's.

The lie was the same: an accusation based on false evidence. The 
people were the same sort: powerful American Jews. The purpose was 
the same: war.

But there were also differences. First, the lie against Hitler 
concerned WMD's that were, for physical and chemical reasons, 
altogether impossible and inconceivable while the lie against Saddam 
Hussein was about WMD's that were quite possible and conceivable, 
since his accusers themselves possessed such devices in great 
abundance. Secondly, the lie against Adolf Hitler was more than half 
a century old and going stronger than ever, while the lie against 
Saddam Hussein was only a few months old and not yet very strong. 
Thirdly, if someone disputed the accusation against Adolf Hitler he 
might, like Ernst Zündel, be sent to prison whereas if someone 
disputed the accusation against Saddam Hussein he would, at least 
currently, be running only slight risks.

Observe how the lie was built up against Saddam Hussein and you will 
see exactly how the lie against Adolf Hitler was forged by the same 
sort of people and for the same purpose: perpetual war.

[END]